Menu
Bejin Bieneman PLC
About the Authors
Mission
Contact Us
»
“subsequent to”
“subsequent to”
PTAB Broadest Reasonable Interpretation: “in response to” Means “subsequent to”
by
Christopher Francis
on
January 27th, 2017
In an ex parte appeal, the PTAB upheld the Examiner’s broadest reasonable interpretation of the patent claim language “in response to” as merely meaning “subsequent to.” The decision is Ex parte Youngri Kim et al. (PTA…
Read More
Subscribe
SWIP Report
Claims Report
Both
Email
*
CAPTCHA
Categories
35 U.S.C. § 101
35 U.S.C. § 112
35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103
Attorney-client privilege
Cancellations
Claim Construction
Copyright
Covered Business Method Patent Review
Declaratory Judgments
Diversity
Enhanced Patent Damages / Attorney Fees
Estoppel - Patent
Ex Parte PTAB Appeals
Fair Use
Indefiniteness
Inequitable Conduct
International Trade Commission
Intervening Patent Rights
Miscellaneous
Patent Civil Procedure
Patent Claim Interpretation
Patent Damages
Patent Eligibility
Patent Exhaustion
Patent Experts
Patent Infringement
Patent Licenses
Patent Marking
Patent Prep and Pros Best Practices
Patent Standards
Patent Term Adjustment
Software Licenses
Software Patents
State and Federal Statutes
The Claims Interpreted Report
The Software IP Report
Trade Secrets
Trademarks
TTAB Procedure
USPTO Post-Issue Proceedings
