101

101

User Interface Features Not Patent-Eligible

by Mike McCandlish on November 26th, 2018
Finding a lack of technical innovation, a court held claims for three features for a user-vehicle interface to be directed to patent-ineligible abstract ideas under the Mayo/Alice test and 35 U.S.C. § 101. Thunder Power New Ener… Read More

Providing Haptic Feedback Patent-eligible or Abstract Idea?

by Mike McCandlish on March 19th, 2018
Claims from two out of three patents for providing haptic feedback to computer users survived a motion to dismiss based on a patent eligibility challenge under the Mayo/Alice test and 35 U.S.C. § 101. Considering their character… Read More

Judge Gilstrap Invalidates Imaging Patent Claims under Alice

by Mike McCandlish on November 15th, 2017
 In Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., et al., (E. D. Texas, October 24, 2017) Judge Gilstrap applied the two-step Alice patent-eligibility analysis and granted Samsung’s Motion for Partial Summary J… Read More

Preview-Based File Sharing Claims Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. §101

by Mike McCandlish on October 9th, 2017
In TS Patents LLC v. Yahoo! Inc., No. 17-cv-01721-lhk, (CAND Sept. 1, 2017) the Court applied the two-step Alice analysis and granted Yahoo’s motion to dismiss an infringement suit from TS Patents, finding claims from four asser… Read More

Subscribe

Categories