Must Examiners Now Cite the Specification to Support Broadest Reasonable Interpretation?

The Patent Trial & Appeal Board applied In Re: Smith Int’l to limit the broadest reasonable interpretation of claim language in Ex parte David Ben Yair (Appeal 2017-002190, decided Jan. 10, 2018).  In this case, the claim i… Read More

Controlling Video Playback Preferences Not Patent-Eligible

Claims reciting a “method of playing back a recorded signal” are “directed to the [patent-ineligible] abstract idea of choosing to playback media with or without playback preferences,” held the court in D&M Holdings, I… Read More

Comments in the Spec that Override Claim Differentiation

In constructing a term in the independent claim in the inter parte review of Kranos Corporation v. Riddell, Inc., (Case IPR2016-01649, Final Written Decision on Feb. 7, 2018),  the Patent Trial & Appeals Board rejected the ap… Read More

Patent-Eligibility and Graham v. John Deere

In vacating a motion to dismiss because it disagreed with a district court’s finding that patent claims were “invalid as directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 USC § 101,” a Federal Circuit panel has made explicit a… Read More

Few Factual Allegations Enough to Allege Patent Infringement

Only a few factual allegations are required to survive a Motion to Dismiss a complaint alleging patent infringement, held the Southern District of Florida in Raptor, LLC. and Concrete Services, LLC. v. Odebrecht Construction, Inc.… Read More